Fruechte Gravity Theory Blog

Should there be any open higher mathematics or physics seminars at colleges or universities that you think I may be interested in, notifying me by email would be greatly appreciated.  As has been the case for some time now, in the company of physicists I have had no desire whatsoever to bring up my physics theory.  I normally introduce myself as an engineer and occasionally a physicist or two has asked me engineering related questions.

The two or three next topics for writing have been tentatively established, one for months now, however it has been a very busy summer with no open time periods long enough to put anything together.  The good news is that it seems I have reached the peak of my engineering career with success on major projects, – nothing done completely on my own of course, at my place of employment.

“If you think education is expensive, try ignorance!”
–      Derek Bok, past president of Harvard
Keep ignoring the quark coincidence.

In October 1976 the musical group Kansas came out with its fourth album, called Leftoverture.  At social gatherings and on the radio that autumn of my freshman year at the University of Wisconsin it was not uncommon to hear the song “Carry On Wayward Son”.  Around the time I was finishing up three semesters of calculus and two of physics as a sophomore, still living in the lakeshore dorms, the group had given us “Point Of Know Return” and “Dust In The Wind” from a fifth album.
Two years ago near the end of this month, I took a circuit drive with copies of my physics paper.  Kansas State University was one of the places I stopped.  It was a fruitful visit because on Ocotober 3, 2006 I received an analysis of the paper from KSU Physics, – only the second one offered independent of the journals.  Something in the KSU analysis prompted me to look for a way to clean up the Rotational Energy section of my paper, which I then did.  That section however, does not have anything to do with the calculation of the frequency of a graviton, but rather is there only to show that there is enough energy in the electron to do the job.
If you see Kerry Livgren, Steve Walsh, Robby Steinhardt or the others of Kansas the band please tell them the ‘point of know return’ in physics has come.  “How long?” does not have to be asked anymore, – it took 28 years.

For those who come to the knowledge of this theory by this web site, without knowing about the YouTube videos, the YouTube links are at: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47JNFaltiN4 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgFBocci8NI&feature=related 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce1JqoCjjZE&feature=related 

Thank you Dan Fordice, Jeff Fordice, and Fairmont High School for the time spent on this! 

  I have gone over your theory at least a dozen times.  It seems very plausible to me that you have figured out what causes gravity.  Yet I still don’t really understand every concept.  I’m thinking that many people who do not have a PHD in Physics will not understand  your theory.  Could you explain to me, in the shortest way possible, the main concept of your gravity theory?  Maybe use words the average high school physics student can comprehend. I would like to ask you questions to clarify each section of your paper until I understand it.

   Thanks,  Jeff Fordice DDS

Psalm 103 (KJV):
1 Bless the Lord, O my soul: and all that is within me, bless his holy name.
2 Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits:
3 Who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases;
4 Who redeemeth thy life from destruction; who crowneth thee with lovingkindness and  tender mercies;
5 Who satisfieth thy mouth with good things; so that thy youth is renewed like the eagle’s.
6 The Lord executeth righteousness and judgment for all that are oppressed.
7 He made known his ways unto Moses, his acts unto the children of Israel.
8 The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy.
9 He will not always chide: neither will he keep his anger for ever.
10 He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
11 For as the heaven is high above the earth, so great is his mercy toward them that fear him.
12 As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.
13 Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear him.
14 For he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust.
15 As for man, his days are as grass: as a flower of the field so he flourisheth.
16 For the wind passeth over it, and it is gone; and the place thereof shall know it no more.
17 But the mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him, and his righteousness unto children’s children;
18 To such as keep his covenant, and to those that remember his commandments to do them.
19 The Lord hath prepared his throne in the heavens; and his kingdom ruleth over all.
20 Bless the Lord, ye his angels, that excel in strength, that do his commandments, hearkening unto the voice of his word.
21 Bless ye the Lord, all ye his hosts; ye ministers of his that do his pleasure.
22 Bless the Lord, all his works in all places of his dominion: bless the Lord, O my soul.

After four journal rejections I have not been real anxious to re-submit the paper, even though the paper has never been submitted to a journal with the spin energy based on a spin angular momentum of ħ/2.  The first Google Base entry, from November 21, 2005, has a spin energy that is way too high, nevertheless the concept, electrons ‘throwing and catching’ gravitons, and the frequency of a graviton are both there in the 2005 documents.  The interest in spin energy was mainly to show that there is enough present to do the job, and there still is with the most recent, copyright April 2007, paper.

It was in Albert Einstein’s 1905 paper “Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?” that he revealed E = mc².  It was a follow-up to his “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” the same year.  The follow-up contains the words, in English translation, near the end: “Moreover, the difference K₀ – K₁, like the kinetic energy of the electron, depends on the velocity.”  Then, at the very end it says: “If the theory corresponds to the facts, radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies.”
Was Einstein close to figuring out gravity?  The Bohr model of the atom was still a few years away, but by that time Einstein was thinking General Relativity and warped space time.