Apr 29 2007
Some Logical Conclusions
Questions that may be answered by this theory include why the particles in the solar wind are not pulled back toward the Sun by its gravity within the first few thousand miles, but rather travel on through the solar system, and why the Van Allen belts do not warp, keeping their shape in the magnetic bottles formed by the Earth’s magnetic field lines.
Other things that can be explained better are neutron stars, and maybe even black holes. By rough calculation an electron in an atomic orbital can give off only 61 gravitons before it collapses into the nucleus of the atom if no gravitons are absorbed by the electron in that time. In areas where the gravitational field is not strong enough, hydrogen atoms in stars will indeed gradually collapse in sequence, and if the resulting neutrons have their magnetic dipole moments aligned in a lattice such as to stabilize the resulting energy, and not decay in just over 15 minutes, a neutron star may result.
Unfortunately, there are also established outcomes of theoretical physics that may no longer be needed, those presumably being the concepts of the quark, the positron, general relativity, dark energy, and string theory.
Quarks, positrons, general relativity, dark energy, and string theories in the garbage. It’s like the discovery of double helix DNA structure – so relatively simple, yet practical, inciting thoughts of ‘why didn’t we think of that’, and providing simple answers to questions once imagined complex.
The reason ‘dark energy’ is not needed is that some gravitons will escape at the speed of light into deep space without encountering any atoms, or more precisely without encountering any oncoming electrons that are in atomic orbitals. The galaxy is likely losing gravitational energy, and thus slowly losing gravitational pull.
Can you give some added detail on how your theory will change the quark, the positron,general relativity,dark energy,and string theory?
It may be that Friedman, Kendall, Taylor, and their teams, caught a few stray gravitons in the late ’60s and early ’70s, and did not know it. The Nobel Prize for their work was given in 1990.
The positron, I believe, was needed to provide the same kind of momentum balance that the graviton provides. That is why we should re-work the equations with the graviton instead.
With the discovery of the cause of gravity, general relativity, – otherwise known as warped space-time, is not needed. No long wavelength gravity waves have been found anyway.
The main focus of string theory is to unite gravity with the other forces of nature, so unless the math can be used for other purposes we don’t need to keep going down that road.
An explanation as to why dark energy is not needed is explained in my 07 Nov entry.